Maua (Xylosma hawaiense)Making the task just a bit tougher.


    Maua is a good example of two phenomena that occur frequently with Hawai‘i’s native plants, both making species preservation even more difficult than it already is. The first is the existence of two or more ecotype varieties of the same species. We see this in maua, koa, naio, ‘a‘ali‘i and several other species. Maua grows wild on all the main Hawaiian Islands except for Ni‘ihau and Kaho‘olawe. Here on O‘ahu, I’ve seen maua in mesic forests but never in dry forests. In contrast, on Hawai‘i in Kona and Lāna‘i at Kānepu‘u, the maua I’ve seen grow in dry forest. The difference between mesic forest and dry forest maua is more than geographic. I have propagated and grown both ecotype varieties and their physiology differ. Simply put, a mesic forest maua does not survive in a dry forest setting (and, I suspect, a dry forest maua would do poorly in a mesic forest).

    The second phenomenon is dioecy, the presence of male pollen-producing and female ovule-producing flowers on separate individuals of the same species. Dioecy in native Hawaiian plants is greater than any other known flora worldwide (Sakai et al. 1995). Maua, ‘ahakea, mēhamehame, and numerous other native Hawaiian plants are dioecious. In ancient times, dioecy was not a problem for these species and probably had adaptive value – maybe, preventing inbreeding depression. However, today, many of these species are rare with individuals widely separated. So widely separated that the pollen from a male plant does not reach the flowers of a female plant. The result is no seeds and no new keiki to ultimately replace the kūpuna plants. Curiously, unpollinated female maua flowers still develop into fruits containing inviable seeds, evidence of the unnatural situation they now find themselves in.